Get 10% off

Exposing Big Wireless Propaganda in the Press: Part 1

Some journalists in the media claim that people concerned with health hazards associated with wireless technology are conspiracy theorists or don’t understand science. Don’t be deceived by Big Wireless’ paid-for-propaganda in the press; we’ll set the record straight. This post series seeks to expose the war on truth portrayed in media to cover up the potential health consequences associated with wireless technology.

In Part 1 of this series, we’ll call out Big Wireless for what they really are: greedy and reckless. We’ll prove that the problem is genuine and not just some “conspiracy theory” by highlighting the evidence that’s right in front of us. We’ll also expose the non-scientific quackery they use to confuse and mislead people and shine a light on the legitimate scientific concerns surrounding wireless radiation exposure.

By reading this series, you’ll become more mindful and aware when researching your health concerns with wireless radiation. You’ll be better equipped to spot the disingenuous attempts by Big Wireless propaganda to lead you astray, and you’ll feel more confident in protecting yourself and your family’s health from wireless radiation pollution. So, join in to uncover the truth about the hazards of wireless technology!

The Ruthless Agenda of Big Wireless

The world is rapidly advancing towards a future where everything is connected through wireless technology and high-speed mobile internet – a mission that Big Wireless is determined to make a reality. But be wary of their promises of innovation and convenience because their true agenda is much more ruthless and ambitious than that.

With the new 5G rollout and beyond, Big Wireless is paving the way for artificial intelligence (AI) to enable a host of futuristic technologies such as robotics, autonomous vehicles, smart cities, and mass surveillance. All of this requires an ever-increasing number of wireless radiation transmitters and antennas concentrated closer to people, animals, and plants.

While various forms of radiation are essential for all living organisms on earth, the manufactured radiation used for wireless technology differs from the natural radiation we have evolved from over time. Now manufactured wireless radiation far exceeds natural radiation background levels and continues to grow exponentially. This means that humanity is entering an untested living environment never before experienced by previous generations.

To gain public support for their ruthless conquest, Big Wireless is financing a cavalry of media propagandists to spread unsupported health safety claims for wireless radiation. Their greed and ignorance of radiation’s long-term biological effects are manifesting in detrimental environmental and health consequences, especially for sensitive groups like pregnant women and babies.

It’s time to wake up and realize the dangerous path that Big Wireless is leading us down. We must resist their agenda and use precautions regarding the proliferation of wireless technology. Our health, and the health of future generations, depends on it.

Myth #1: Wireless Safety Concerns Are Just “Conspiracy Theories”

It’s outrageous that Big Wireless and its lackeys in the media continue to push false narratives over the health risks associated with wireless radiation. They try to paint anyone who raises concerns about these risks as a conspiracy theorist or a member of some fringe group to discredit them and avoid an honest debate about the science.

This bully tactic is a cheap attempt to discredit those raising legitimate concerns. Why would Big Wireless address these valid health concerns when they can mislabel you as disingenuous or delusional in the public eye? They hope that by doing so, they can deter people from investigating the truth.

But let’s be clear: the real conspiracy here is the one being perpetrated by Big Wireless itself. They know  that their products pose a real risk to public health, but they’re more concerned with making a profit than with protecting people. And they’re willing to use any tactics necessary to silence their critics and keep the truth from coming out.

So, the next time you see an article dismissing concerns about wireless radiation as the ravings of conspiracy theorists, remember that this is another form of gaslighting. But don’t be tricked by cliché insults because Big Wireless is the real bad actor here. We deserve the truth about the risks of wireless technology, and we won’t be silenced by their propaganda any longer. We must be aware and protect ourselves from their greedy and reckless agenda before it’s too late.

The Proof in Plain Sight

It’s time to expose the corrupt journalists from Big Wireless who are trying to silence rational public discourse on the potential health consequences of wireless radiation. Don’t be deceived by their propaganda – the evidence is out there for anyone to discover.

A simple Google search, preferably Google Scholar, will reveal thousands of peer-reviewed research studies from respected publications, detailing the robust and credible evidence linking wireless radiation to numerous potential health complications. The evidence is so clear and compelling that it’s obvious that corrupt journalists have an agenda to suppress the truth.

But don’t let them win the day. With some quality research, you can discern the truth for yourself. Don’t let corrupt journalists from Big Wireless silence rational public discourse on this vital issue. It’s time to stand up for the truth and demand accountability from those who seek to silence it.

Myth #2: Scientists Agree That Wireless Radiation is Safe

Big Wireless propaganda wants you to believe that wireless technology is scientifically proven safe for your health. But the reality is that wireless radiation has proven “thermal effects,” meaning it can heat your body’s tissues with short-term exposures. This fact is universally accepted by the scientific community and is the basis for current safety regulations on wireless technology. It’s no secret either, as you can find this information buried deep in the manuals of your devices or online, although it’s not widely publicized.

In addition, a growing amount of scientific evidence proves many more potential health risks due to reasons other than short-term tissue heating. This leaves concerned scientist warning of health consequences in store for many exposure scenarios not accounted for by safety regulators. Despite this, corrupt journalists paid by Big Wireless will still try to convince you that there’s nothing to be concerned about regarding the health risks of wireless radiation. Don’t be fooled! The truth is out there, and it’s time to start paying attention to objective scientific evidence.

Legitimate Health Concerns from Scientists

The debate  among health scientists is not whether wireless radiation negatively affects human health but whether the current safety standards are adequate to protect the public. An abundance of emerging evidence shows an array of potential negative health effects at current safety levels, including genetic damage, cellular stress, immune dysfunction, reproductive changes, neurological disorders, hypersensitivity, and cancer. It’s time to recognize that current wireless radiation safety limitation standards are outdated and inadequate. Scientists are especially concerned for vulnerable populations, such as fetuses and children, whose bodies and brains are disproportionately affected by wireless radiation. Despite their increased susceptibility, regulators consider them “small adults” when setting safety limits on wireless radiation.

According to the American Academy of Pediatrics , the potential health damages from wireless radiation exposure are greater for fetuses and young children than for previous generations. Children’s smaller heads allow for deeper penetration of wireless radiation, making them more vulnerable to its effects. Additionally, their developing brains and immune systems are at increased risk. It’s time for governments and regulators to take action to protect the most vulnerable among us.

Myth #3: The Ionization Paradigm

As consumers, we all rely on journalists to accurately report the facts. Unfortunately, some corrupt journalists mislead us because we lack familiarity with complex physics principles. They take a single irrelevant fact and use it to make overreaching health claims about the safety of wireless technology. Be aware of this rabbit hole! This tactic is used to discredit any evidence of adverse health effects from wireless radiation, leaving us in the dark about the true dangers.

The problem with this approach is that it oversimplifies the science behind radiation and its effects on our bodies. Sure, wireless sources use lower energy than nuclear waste or X-ray machines, but that doesn’t mean they’re safe. In fact, there are many ways radiation from wireless sources can affect our health, and referring to the “ionization paradigm” only serves to misguide us.

Big Wireless and their paid journalists often use the distinction between “non-ionizing” and “ionizing” forms of EMF radiation to create a false sense of safety. By claiming that only ionizing radiation is harmful and all other frequencies are considered harmless, they hope to dissuade us from further investigation. But we shouldn’t be fooled! With a bit of research and critical thinking, we can uncover the truth and protect ourselves from the real dangers of wireless radiation.

The Problem is Real

As concerning as it sounds, the truth is that the impact of wireless radiation on human health is much more significant than what we are led to believe. Despite the widespread agreement among scientists globally on the health hazards posed by the “thermal effects” (rapid heating of body tissue) of wireless radiation, the long-term effects on human health from wireless radiation are many and varied and cannot be attributed solely to the heating process.

It is essential to note that the effects of radiation exposure are incredibly complex and contingent on many variables, including frequency, intensity, distance, time duration, cell type, wave polarization, wave direction, anatomical features, and tissue properties. Indeed that’s a mouthful, but it’s essential to keep in mind that the scientific principles involved in radiation exposure are incredibly complex and interdependent on many different exposure scenarios.

Please Don’t Wait Until It’s Too Late

Parents and child caregivers, you are the guardians of the next generation, and you cannot afford to be complacent about potential health hazards. We all know that discovering the truth requires effort and determination, but the cost of inaction could be devastating. The sad history of industries prioritizing profits over people’s health should serve as a warning for us all. Remember tobacco smoke, asbestos, and lead? The market accepted these widely before science caught up with the truth.

We cannot rely on corrupt individuals to twist reality and discredit those who oppose their agendas. Parents and caregivers, it is up to you to take charge and stay informed about the potential hazards that threaten your children’s health. You cannot afford to wait for legal intervention, as the harm to your children will have already been done. We must learn from the past and proactively protect our loved ones. Check out Part 2 of this series for a deep dive!

We will address the myths learned from Part 1 of this series to debunk propaganda from real-life examples in the media.

Shopping Cart
Scroll to Top